Comparison
TwentyCore vs AutoCount
Bursa-listed desktop incumbent versus a cloud manufacturing OS.
Honest position
Where this comparison starts.
AutoCount claims 240,000+ businesses. Desktop RM1,600–9,000 plus modules (manufacturing configs RM10–20k+); cloud RM70–180/mo. E-invoice is deep (real-time, self-billed, ingests supplier e-invoices). Manufacturing is assembly-only BOM. AI is SmartScan OCR only (RM10/200 credits).
TwentyCore competitor research from published price lists (researched Aug 2026). Ballparks, not a quote.
Where TwentyCore is strong
- Cloud-native MRP and costing; AutoCount manufacturing is assembly-only BOM — manufacturers outgrow it.
- No RM6–9k edition wall and no LAN lag on a shared desktop.
Where the alternative may win
- Accountant familiarity and dealer proximity.
- Deep e-invoice, including ingesting supplier e-invoices.
- Claimed installed base 240,000+ businesses.
Decision matrix
The practical criteria behind the comparison.
This matrix avoids exaggerated claims. It shows what a buyer should verify from TwentyCore and from the alternative vendor during the same procurement process.
Pricing
TwentyCore:Manufacturing OS RM3,999/mo flat (commercial model).
Alternative:Desktop RM1,600–9,000 + mfg modules RM10–20k+; cloud RM70–180/mo; SmartScan RM10/200 credits.
Manufacturing
TwentyCore:Multi-level BOM, MRP, QC, costing.
Alternative:Assembly-only BOM — manufacturers outgrow it.
E-invoice
TwentyCore:First-party MyInvois.
Alternative:Deep: real-time, self-billed, ingests supplier e-invoices.
Verified pain
TwentyCore:Newer vendor; must prove the cutover.
Alternative:“Dead” forum, 6–12h support replies; capability walled behind RM6–9k editions.
Buyer criteria
Compare with proof, not brand familiarity alone.
Use these criteria in a vendor review. TwentyCore should be asked to prove the same things as larger ERP vendors, especially where the implementation risk sits inside real workflows.
Manufacturing depth
Can the system show CRM, WMS, production, quality, shipping, and finance as one workflow?
Malaysia compliance
Which LHDN, SST, payroll, and statutory steps are native, and which require customer credential validation?
Implementation proof
Can the vendor run a disposable-tenant UAT script and show pass/fail evidence?
Data ownership
Can the buyer export data and understand retention/deletion before signing?
Security evidence
Can the vendor show tenant isolation, backups, incident process, subprocessors, and certification limits?
Total operating fit
Does the product reduce daily handoffs for the exact users who will run it?
Safe claim
Every AutoCount number on this page is from published prices verified in August 2026. We do not guess support SLAs beyond “6–12h replies”.
AutoCount wins on familiarity. TwentyCore wins when assembly-only BOM is no longer enough.